How I Made My Home More Energy Efficient

English: The carbon footprint as it is understood by people. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

By Bernadette T Janson

Recycling, re-use and environmental responsibly are now regular conversations around the dinner table. The evidence of those discussions have seeped their way into just about every aspect of daily life.

Don't get me wrong, there's no badge carrying tree hugger here just a pragmatic wife, mother and renovator who detests waste and senseless destruction.

There is a Native American proverb 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children'.

You don't have to be Einstein to work out that if our generation keeps chewing through our natural resources (including our ozone layer) at the current rate, there won't be a lot left for the next generation.

There is a lot of political mileage traded on the back of the green debate but at least part of the solution lies in exercising good old commonsense and granny's frugal ways not only save money, they also save the environment. You actually don't have to be a raging environmental evangelist to make a difference.

The outcome of one of our dinner table conversations on all things green was a commitment to audit the energy use of our household and reduce our carbon footprint. It was an interesting exercise as I made a couple of quite interesting discoveries.

1. It is quite easy to significantly reduce your energy consumption.
2. The idealistic environmental responsibility of a teenager disappears rapidly when the practical realities surface.

Lights are made out to be the villains of energy use given the legislation that has gone to converting the population to low energy alternatives.

In an attempt to support our crusade with some science I purchased a device to monitor our energy use and discovered that lights accounted for only 5% of our total electricity usage. Common household appliances such as the dishwasher, washing machine, oven and dryer used 200 to 500 times more power than a light globe. The other big-ticket item in the energy stakes is hot water accounting for 65% of total usage.

If you have ever read any of Tim Ferris' books, he talks about the Minimum Effective Dose, employing the smallest measure to make the biggest difference. This theory is very effective when applied to reducing energy consumption.

Small Changes

I made four changes that cut our energy consumption by 40%:

- Change the hot water over to solar
- Changed the air conditioning temperature by one degree ( up for cooling, down for heating)
- Keep baking for when the oven was already heated to cook dinner.
- Reduced the temperature of the water in the dishwasher and the washing machine.

These changes also produce a saving of $150 per month.

So, not only is energy efficiency good for the environment, it is also very good for the budget.

Bernadette Janson is the director of the school of renovating, for more information go to http://www.theschoolofrenovating.com.au

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Bernadette_T_Janson
http://EzineArticles.com/?How-I-Made-My-Home-More-Energy-Efficient&id=7048481

The Energy Wars Heat Up

Cut and edited from Image:MiddleEast.png, in the GIMP (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

by Toms Dispatch, on Blacklisted News.com: http://www.blacklistednews.com

There has been much discussion recently about the Obama administration’s “pivot” from the Greater Middle East to Asia: the 250 Marines sent to Darwin, Australia, the littoral combat ships for Singapore, the support for Burmese “democracy,” war games in the Philippines (and a drone strike there as well), and so on.

The U.S. is definitely going offshore in Asian waters, or put another way, after a decade-long hiatus-cum-debacle on the Eurasian continent, the Great Game v. China is back on.

While true, however, the importance of this policy change has been exaggerated.  At the moment, as it happens, the greatest game isn’t in Asia at all; it’s in the Persian Gulf where, off the coast of Iran and in bases around the region, the U.S. is engaged in a staggering build-up of naval and air power.

Most people would have little idea that this was even going on, since it rarely makes its way into the mainstream and even less often onto front pages or into the headlines.

The Washington Times, for instance, has been alone in reporting that, for the U.S. military, “war planning for Iran is now the most pressing scenario.” It adds that the “U.S. Central Command believes it can destroy or significantly degrade Iran’s conventional armed forces in about three weeks using air and sea strikes.”

Most of the time, however, you have to be a genuine news jockey or read specialist sites to notice the scale of what’s going on, even though the build-up in the Gulf is little short of monumental and evidently not close to finished.

It’s not just the two aircraft carrier task forces now there, but (as the invaluable Danger Room website has reported) the doubling of minesweepers stationed in Bahrain, as well as the addition of minesweeping helicopters and coastal patrol boats that are being retrofitted with Gattling guns and missiles.

Throw in new advanced torpedoes for Gulf waters and mini-drone subs; add in newly outfitted units of F-22s and F-15s heading for bases in the Gulf to make up “the world’s most powerful air-to-air fighting team.” And don’t forget the major CIA drone surveillance program already in operation over Iran (and undoubtedly still being bolstered).

To read further, go to: http://www.blacklistednews.com/The_Energy_Wars_Heat_Up/19420/0/0/0/Y/M.html